Home>Governor>High-Speed Rail Project Takes Heat from Every Corner
Governor Highlight Legislature

High-Speed Rail Project Takes Heat from Every Corner

Sen. Stone sides with Trump, announces legislation to repay feds

By Laura Hauther, February 26, 2019 11:19 am

Senator Jeff Stone wants to end the high-speed rail and return the money invested so far to the federal government.
Senator Jeff Stone. (Jeff Stone campaign)

After Gavin Newsom seemed to throw shade on California’s high speed rail project in his State of the State address, opponents of the project jumped on the chance to push it into an early grave.

President Trump responded by gleefully offering to pull a billion dollars in federal funds, while the U.S. Department of Transportation threatened to claw back the 2.5 billion that California has already received for what the Federal Railroad Administration called the “now defunct” high speed rail project.

Then on Tuesday state Senator Jeff Stone (R-La Quinta), siding with the feds, announced his proposed legislation, SB 340, stopping the sale of any remaining general obligations bonds for the high speed rail project. His bill would allow any unspent funds to be used to retire already incurred debts from the issuance and sale of the bonds before being redirected to other projects.

“California’s High-Speed Rail is nothing more than the construction of an unsustainable and unachievable boondoggle dream,” said Stone, who recently defeated Joy Silver to win his second term after a surprisingly tough election in a dismal year for Republicans. “California’s bullet train project has gone off the rails. It’s time to stop pouring good money after bad.”

“The Governor has rightfully admitted the promises made to voters in 2008 when they narrowly approved Proposition 1A have been broken,” Stone added,” and it seems clear now is the time to cut bait and admit the fantasy has failed.”

Another Republican, state Senator John Moorlach (R-Orange County), responded with an alternative solution for faster travel between the state’s major northern and southern cities – a California Autobahn.

“The stats prove that driving in Germany is safer,” Moorlach said, according to the Desert Sun, “And, there’s less congestion.”

Germany’s traffic death rate is less than half that of the United States.

Moorlach’s plan, set out in SB 319, would add two lanes over 235 miles of I-5 and highway 99 from Bakersfield to Stockton, allowing drivers to go as fast as they dared.

Some have pointed out the hidden benefit of this approach – increased tourism.

It would be the only road in the US without a speed limit, the first of its kind since Montana reversed its ‘no daytime speed limit’ law in 1999. California could find drivers with a need for speed drawn to the state just to experience the thrill of pushing their car to the limit.

Others envision an anarchic Mad Max scenario where irresponsible drivers ignore basic safety rules in search of thrills, instead of a practical alternative—or addition – to waiting over a decade for high speed rail.

Since that speech, Newsom has issued statements meant to clarify his position on high speed rail. He said he did not mean to say the rail project was no longer going to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco. The change was in the plan’s focus on completing the 110-mile stretch already underway in the Central Valley that will connect Merced and Bakersfield by 2027. The remaining segments connecting California’s two biggest cities will be re-evaluated once that portion is nearer to completion, to create “a spine from which the rest of the system can grow,” according to High Speed Rail advocate, Bay Area Council President and CEO, Jim Wunderman in a statement to abc7 News.

Newsom plans to complete the environmental reviews for the entire planned route, a requirement for keeping the federal funds California already received. That didn’t stop Ronald Batory of the Federal Railroad Administration from using what he called “a significant retreat from the state’s initial vision and commitment” to start moving toward withdrawing federal funding.

California officials have until March 5 to challenge this process.

Laura Hauther

Laura Hauther is a veteran reporter for KPFK and has written for several LA weekly newspapers.
Spread the news:
Filter by
Post Page
Highlight Articles Local Alameda Legal Legislature Governor
Sort by

Oakland City Council Reneges on Army Base Redevelopment Project

Due process and government accountability be damned when ‘wokeness’ is at stake
November 11, 2019 4:46 pm


Chicano Latino Youth Leadership Project

Chicano Latino Youth Leadership Project Hits Capitol

Goal is to train future leaders (and have some pizza on a sultry day)
July 17, 2019 5:50 pm


Record Public Safety and Judicial Pork Barrel Projects in California’s Largest State Budget

Part Vl: Public Safety and Judicial pork projects
June 20, 2019 8:31 am


One thought on “High-Speed Rail Project Takes Heat from Every Corner

  1. Don’t back down!!!

    Challenge it all the way and treat this as the opening Salvo in curbing the socialist Democrat spendthrift and rallying Independents over to the conservative side….

    No one wants a train until old-fashioned public courtesy returns to the public square….that ain’t happening until social cohesion can be restored….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *